Dynastic politics in Tamil Nadu is neither a recent phenomenon nor a peripheral trend. It remains deeply embedded in the state’s political fabric, shaped by a unique interplay of ideology, organisational structure, personality-driven leadership, and legacy. As the 2026 Assembly elections approach, familiar political lineages have once again taken centre stage.
A key factor underpinning this continuity lies in the evolution of Dravidian politics itself. Parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam emerged not merely as electoral platforms but as socio-cultural movements. Over time, leadership within these movements became increasingly centralised around influential figures and, subsequently, their families.
The powerful intersection of cinema and politics further reinforced this trend. From the literary and screenwriting legacy of M. Karunanidhi to the enduring mass appeal of icons like M. G. Ramachandran and J. Jayalalithaa, political mobilisation in the state has long revolved around charismatic personalities. This dynamic has naturally extended political capital to their families, creating a system where recognisable surnames carry significant electoral weight.
That pattern is clearly visible in the current election cycle. Chief Minister M. K. Stalin has filed his nomination from Kolathur, the constituency he presently represents. His son, Udhayanidhi Stalin, is contesting from Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni, reinforcing the family’s political presence in Chennai.
Within the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam camp, veteran leader O. Panneerselvam is contesting from Bodinayakanur, a constituency in southern Tamil Nadu where he continues to command considerable influence.
The Pattali Makkal Katchi also reflects similar dynamics. Sowmiya Anbumani, wife of Anbumani Ramadoss, has filed her nomination from Dharmapuri, underscoring the continued presence of family-linked candidatures across party lines.
These examples illustrate that dynastic politics in Tamil Nadu is not confined to a single political formation but represents a broader structural feature of the state’s electoral landscape.
However, the model has increasingly come under political scrutiny. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly criticised dynastic politics during his campaign speeches in the state, arguing that it restricts opportunities for grassroots leadership and weakens governance. Positioning the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as an alternative, he has taken aim at what he describes as “family-run parties.”
Similarly, AIADMK leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami has raised concerns over the issue, stating that dynastic politics has constrained internal democracy and hindered the emergence of new leadership within parties. His remarks come even as sections within his own party continue to reflect the influence of entrenched political families.
As Tamil Nadu heads toward a crucial electoral contest, dynastic politics remains both a defining characteristic of its political system and a focal point of debate—highlighting the tension between legacy-driven leadership and demands for broader democratic participation
.png)
The opinions posted here do not belong to 🔰www.indiansdaily.com. The author is solely responsible for the opinions.
As per the IT policy of the Central Government, insults against an individual, community, religion or country, defamatory and inflammatory remarks, obscene and vulgar language are punishable offenses. Legal action will be taken for such expressions of opinion.