UNITED NATIONS — In a notable recalibration of its diplomatic stance, India has officially joined a diverse coalition of nations condemning Israel’s recent unilateral actions in the West Bank. While New Delhi was conspicuously absent from the initial list of signatories, it added its name to the joint statement 24 hours later, signaling a firm adherence to its long-standing principles regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
A Strategic Reversal on the Global Stage
The joint statement, issued on February 17, 2026, and delivered at the United Nations by Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour, follows a meeting of the U.S. Board of Peace. India now stands alongside a broad international front, including:
- Multilateral Blocs: The League of Arab States and the European Union.
- BRICS Partners: Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa.
- QUAD Allies: Australia and Japan.
- Regional Neighbors: Bangladesh, Maldives, Pakistan, and Mauritius.
This shift, characterized by some observers as a "U-turn," suggests that while India maintains a robust strategic partnership with Israel, it remains unwilling to overlook actions that contravene international law.
Concerns Over Legal Status and Demographics
The core of the criticism centers on Israel’s move to designate vast tracts of the West Bank as "State Land." This administrative process is viewed by the international community as a de facto annexation of Palestinian territory.
India’s official position highlights several key concerns:
- Violation of International Law: New Delhi expressed disapproval of Israel's "illegal presence" and unilateral legislative changes in the occupied territories.
- Demographic Shifts: India warned that these policies appear designed to alter the demographic character of the region, which complicates the viability of a future two-state solution.
- Property Rights: New legislation lifting restrictions on land acquisitions by external parties—combined with aggressive document verification—threatens the displacement of Palestinian residents.
Balancing Diplomacy and Principle
The delay in India’s endorsement sparked intense debate among former diplomats and policy analysts. Some questioned if the initial silence signaled a pivot toward a more pro-Israel alignment to bolster ties with Washington. However, the subsequent endorsement reaffirms India’s traditional "middle path."
"India’s decision to sign the statement underscores that its friendship with Israel does not come at the cost of its principled support for Palestinian sovereignty and the established norms of international law."
By aligning with both its BRICS and QUAD partners on this issue, India has signaled that it will continue to evaluate Middle Eastern developments through the lens of global consensus rather than bilateral convenience.
.png)
The opinions posted here do not belong to 🔰www.indiansdaily.com. The author is solely responsible for the opinions.
As per the IT policy of the Central Government, insults against an individual, community, religion or country, defamatory and inflammatory remarks, obscene and vulgar language are punishable offenses. Legal action will be taken for such expressions of opinion.