Dublin: The Irish High Court has quashed the government's decision to bar a young Indian man from a residence permit after his second marriage. The judge said the Indian National arrived here in March 2013 as a student and was allowed to stay on a student visa until September 2014. He was barred from residency by the Minister of Justice on the grounds that his first marriage was a paid sham marriage.
Story:
In March 2013, a young Indian man arrived in Ireland on a one-year visa to study. The visa was valid until September 2014. In 2015, the young man married a Portuguese woman for the first time and applied for an Irish residency permit. But the government decided that the Portuguese marriage contract was a paid sham marriage and that permission could not be granted.
In a 2015 investigation by the Garda National Immigration Bureau, a Portuguese woman admitted that she had made money contract with a 32 - year - old Indian man and had come to Ireland from Portugal only to sign a contract. Garda also withheld his residence visa.
Despite this, the young man married a Polish girl for the second time. He began living with a Polish woman who worked at the same fast food outlet where he worked. In its name he applied for a residency permit again. However, the minister rejected the application citing a previous fake marriage. Ordered deportation.
The youth went to the high court against this. The court also ruled that a Polish girl living in Ireland from a young age did not have to pay to get married, and that he had the only supporter and shade of this young woman who had been suffering from serious health problems since 2016.
Justice Anthony Barr had suggested that the Minister of Justice had erred in his decision to reconsider, as the Minister had failed to examine the evidence of his subsequent affair with a Polish woman.
.jpg)
.png)
The opinions posted here do not belong to 🔰www.indiansdaily.com. The author is solely responsible for the opinions.
As per the IT policy of the Central Government, insults against an individual, community, religion or country, defamatory and inflammatory remarks, obscene and vulgar language are punishable offenses. Legal action will be taken for such expressions of opinion.