At around 7:15 a.m. on September 6, just hours after Nepal’s ban on 26 social media platforms took effect, an official jeep carrying Koshi Province minister Ram Bahadur Magar struck 11-year-old Usha Magar Sunuwar outside Harisiddhi Secondary School in Lalitpur.
CCTV footage showed the child hurled to the roadside as the convoy sped away. Though Usha survived with injuries, the image of a young girl abandoned by a government vehicle spread rapidly across phones before the blackout took full hold—igniting a wave of fury.
What might have been dismissed as an isolated accident instead became a flashpoint for broader discontent. Then–Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s response, describing the crash as a “normal accident” and offering only to cover medical expenses, was widely condemned as emblematic of an entitled political culture.
“The apathy revealed in that moment eroded what little trust remained,” said Yog Raj Lamichhane, assistant professor at Pokhara University. “If a minister’s car can hit a schoolgirl and the PM calls it normal, what message does that send to the rest of us?”
For young Nepalis, already seething over corruption, nepotism, and joblessness, the incident was the breaking point. “They didn’t just brush off a child’s pain,” said Mira Thapa, a 20-year-old sociology student at Tribhuvan University. “They showed us that we don’t matter. This was the spark.”
Youth Anger at Boiling Point
Nepal’s youth face one of South Asia’s highest unemployment rates. In 2024, 20.8% of those aged 15–24 were jobless, according to the World Bank. Each year, hundreds of thousands migrate to the Gulf or Malaysia, while those who stay contend with inflation, stalled infrastructure, and a political order that appears detached from their struggles. Personal remittances now account for 33.1% of Nepal’s GDP.
“If we can make our country better, our youth can stay here,” said 20-year-old protester Muna Shreshta outside Parliament.
Corruption scandals and dynastic politics have deepened frustrations. Ministries and embassies remain dominated by political families. “Everywhere you look, it’s sons, daughters, nephews of politicians filling posts,” said Sushil Pyakurel, former commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission. “Ordinary citizens are left scrambling for crumbs.”
For many, it feels as though opportunity itself has been captured by a privileged elite. “My friends call it soft exile,” said 24-year-old designer Srijana Limbu. “Either you leave the country, or you live here with no dignity. We’re educated, connected, and ignored.”
Adding to resentment is the rise of so-called “nepo kids”—children of powerful figures flaunting luxury lifestyles online. “They show off on Instagram and TikTok but never explain where the money comes from,” one protester said, underscoring a grievance that had grown even before the social media ban.
From Frustration to Revolt
Analysts say the protests were inevitable. “The social media ban added fuel to grievances rooted in decades of neglect,” said Lamichhane. “Young people are no longer willing to wait. They want change now.”
In Kathmandu, chants of “Oli chor, desh chhod” (“Oli thief, leave the country”) rang out, both anthem and accusation. “We were raised on stories of democracy, but we live inside a monarchy of ministers,” said history graduate Bibek Adhikari. “One surname can open every door.”
Some political leaders have acknowledged the depth of anger while urging restraint. “Yes, corruption and nepotism are real issues,” said Nepali Congress leader and former foreign minister NP Saud. “But they must be resolved through legal means and the constitution.”
For protesters like Rachana Sapkota, 35, legality is no longer the point. “My humanity didn’t allow me to stay at home after seeing what happened yesterday,” she said. “We want justice—for those injured, and for those who died.”
The opinions posted here do not belong to 🔰www.indiansdaily.com. The author is solely responsible for the opinions.
As per the IT policy of the Central Government, insults against an individual, community, religion or country, defamatory and inflammatory remarks, obscene and vulgar language are punishable offenses. Legal action will be taken for such expressions of opinion.